What You Know About Passive Investment Is Wrong!
There’s a huge amount of false information that has been circulating regarding active and passive investment. As a matter of fact, it stirs a lot of debate to many for quite some time. What’s more, there’s much at stake from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What’s unfortunate for investors is that, it is not possible to try out other investment opportunities. Instead, it is requiring a great deal of great deal of analysis and research to choose a strategy. Regardless if you are rooting for active or passive, it is extremely important that you make yourself aware of the facts from fiction in order to come up with a well informed decision to how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
To help refining the debate between the two subjects, here are facts that have to be cleared up regarding passive investment.
Number 1. There is no action – if only passive investing was so basic like placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. Well the truth is, passive investors can actually be performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
When developing a portfolio together with passive investments similar to index funds, the action begins by allocating money strategically among varieties of asset classes that can help in achieving long term financial goal. If those allocations change, more action is to be found with the passive investor particularly to those who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back in their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – yes this is true mainly because of the cost but, average returns are in eye of investors. Index funds are seeking to replicate market index so even if they do accurately, it will still be below average for the net of fees. On the other hand, index funds normally have lower costs compared to active funds meaning, they have better probabilities of getting near market averages for a long period of time.
Active funds are also charging higher fees for personnel to perform research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record of matching or even beating market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – detractors of passive investment believe that it could not beat its counterpart or active investments since they’re not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events. But, there’s actually a benefit from the uniformity of passive investing since same strategy can be applied from one investor to the other.